
MyFunded Futures is taking a rare step toward regulatory legitimacy in a space long dominated by challenge-based evaluation models. The firm has begun preparing to register as an Introducing Broker (IB) with the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the National Futures Association (NFA). This is a move that could reshape how prop firms interact with traders in regulated markets.
A recent leadership job listing confirms its intent to build a brokerage framework that complies with U.S. financial rules, suggesting a break from the loosely governed models common across the industry. This development comes as regulators increase scrutiny on firms offering simulated trading access with real cash incentives. Whether this signals a broader industry shift or remains a one-off compliance play remains to be seen, but the direction MyFunded Futures is heading is unlike what most of its peers are currently attempting.

MyFunded Futures IB Registration with CFTC
A recent LinkedIn job posting confirms that MyFunded Futures is actively preparing to register as a U.S. Introducing Broker (IB). The position, titled “Director of Brokerage Operations – Futures Brokerage,” is explicitly tied to the company’s regulatory ambitions within the futures space.
An Introducing Broker is a registered firm that solicits or accepts futures orders from clients but does not handle customer funds. Instead, it partners with a Futures Commission Merchant (FCM) to execute and clear trades. This setup ensures that all client money remains with the FCM, under direct regulatory oversight.
Further reinforcing its regulatory direction, a separate job listing, posted on LinkedIn in July 2025, titled “Financial & Regulatory Controller — FCM” reveals plans for launching a CFTC‑registered Futures Commission Merchant. This suggests MyFunded Futures may not only act as a broker but also handle its own clearing and fund custody operations, which would represent a deeper level of structural and regulatory commitment than the IB model alone.
The “Director of Brokerage Operations” role will lead the firm’s infrastructure buildout as it completes IB registration and establishes internal compliance systems. This signals a clear pivot toward formal oversight under the National Futures Association and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
MyFunded Futures appears to be charting a different path than typical challenge-based prop firms. Rather than relying solely on evaluation programs and retention of trader fees, moving toward IB and possibly FCM status would require meeting capital requirements, segregating client funds, and filing regular regulatory disclosures.
This opens a new chapter as the company positions itself not just as a capital provider, but as a fully regulated gateway between retail traders and the futures markets.
This Might Be the Start of a Bigger Shift
MyFunded Futures making this move might shake up the prop trading industry. Most firms avoid regulation entirely, sticking with simulated accounts and unregulated payouts. Very few have ever attempted formal U.S. registration.
But this is not happening in a vacuum. In Europe and Asia, regulators are already tightening the leash, some have started treating challenge models as financial services, while others are warning retail users about the risks of dealing with unregulated platforms.
If other U.S. firms decide to follow this route, they’ll face a very different reality. IB registration means oversight, structure, and accountability. It also limits the free-for-all approach many firms have used to scale quickly.
Here’s what could change if more prop firms go this route:
- Regulatory filings and disclosures would become mandatory
- Onboarding would require proper verification
- Firms would need to work with licensed clearing partners
- Profit payouts would be subject to compliance rules
- Advertising would fall under financial promotion laws
Most firms are likely watching to see how this plays out for MyFunded Futures. If it works, it could blur the line between challenge firms and real-market access.
What It Means for Everyday Traders

For traders, what MyFunded Futures is trying to do could actually change how things work day to day. If they pull this off, it means no more dealing with firms that make up their own rules on payouts, drawdowns, or sudden rule changes halfway through a challenge. Registering as an Introducing Broker with the CFTC means they’d be playing by a real rulebook, and someone would be watching.
Here’s why that matters. IBs don’t get to hold trader funds. Everything goes through a licensed clearing firm, known as a Futures Commission Merchant, which handles the money and clears the trades. That means more protection for traders if anything goes sideways. No sudden website shutdowns, no delays with “pending” payouts, and no wondering who’s actually in control.
A recent survey by Finance Magnates backs this up. Nearly 60 percent of traders said they trust prop firms more when they’re backed by a regulated broker. That trust mostly comes down to things like clearer rules, actual accountability, and knowing someone can step in if something goes wrong.
If MyFunded Futures finishes this transition, a few things are likely to change:
- Your funds stay protected with a licensed clearing firm
- Payouts and profit splits will have to follow real compliance rules
- Ads and promo offers can’t be misleading or vague
- There will be proper channels for complaints and disputes
But it’s not all upside. Going regulated means tighter rules. The days of 1:100 leverage and fast-track challenge resets might be over. You could see stricter risk limits or slower processing depending on how they structure it.
Still, this could be a big step forward. Most firms aren’t willing to make this kind of move. If it works, it sets a new bar for what traders expect from a prop firm, not just funding, but a setup you can actually trust.
Final Thoughts
What MyFunded Futures is doing might look small now, but it could mark the start of something bigger. Most firms stick to what is easy, fast cash and low oversight. This one is choosing the hard road: regulation, structure, real trust. It is not perfect, but it is a step in the right direction. If it works, we might finally see prop trading become something more than just pay to play.